October 27, 2021

Immigration and Conflict

Outline

  • South-North vs South-South immigration
  • Refugees and identity formation in Tanzania
  • Evidence

Immigration Context

Different patterns of immigration

  • Dancygier (2010) looked at immigration to UK, Europe
  • But refugee and immigrant flows by far between countries in the Global South, not to Europe/North America

Different patterns of immigration

What might be different about immigration in this context compared to immigration to places like UK, Canada?

Different patterns of immigration

Possible differences:

  • immigration driven more by conflict/displacement?
  • immigrants/refugees enter already ethnically diverse societies
    • weaker states, weaker national identity
  • immigrants/refugees may have co-ethnics in the host country
  • assistance from UN/humanitarian organizations?

Different patterns of immigration

Different patterns of immigration

Thinking about explanations for ethnic conflict we’ve discussed…

How might the influx of refugees across a border affect ethnic identification and ethnic politics?

Example: Tanzania

Example: Tanzania

Kigoma region of Tanzania

  • home to 35 ethnic groups
  • border with Burundi
  • colonial border divided linguistic-cultural group
  • Ha (ethnic majority in Kigoma) share language, culture, intermarriage, trade with Hutu population in Burundi

Example: Tanzania

Repeated ethnic violence in Burundi has displaced hundreds of thousands (1972, 1993)

  • The displaced were primarily Hutus
  • Political crisis in Burundi 2015 triggered protests and violence:
    • 230,000 people fled Burundi into Kigoma
    • Kigoma region is only 2 million people
    • 10% shock in population over 1-2 years

Example: Tanzania

Refugee influx:

Example: Tanzania

Example: Tanzania

What are your expectations?

Will refugee inflow…

  • increase salience of Ha-Hutu ethnic group identity vs others?
  • increase salience of insider (national) vs outsider (refugee)?
  • fail to change salient ethnic identities?

Zhou (2019)

Zhou (2019)

Building on Social Identity Theory:

  • Refugees perceived as a threat (destabilizing, competing for resources)
  • Co-ethnicity with refugees lowers ethnic group status
  • To maintain positive status \(\to\) emphasize national over ethnic identity
  • Humanitarian aid to refugees \(\to\) demands for public goods as national citizens

Zhou (2019): Evidence

Zhou (2019): Evidence

Surveyed people in 2016:

  • after refugee influx
  • before creation of additional refugee camps

Zhou (2019): Evidence

Greater national identification near existing refugee camps ## Zhou (2019): Evidence

Experiment: what if you remind people about refugee camps?

Zhou (2019): Evidence

In focus groups, when reminded of refugees

  • made more demands about public goods
  • emphasized schooling
  • schools depend on local committees to raise funds, monitor performance

Zhou (2019): Evidence

Comparing schools in 2017 (post-influx) against 2012…

Bigger improvement in performance near refugee camps

Conclusion:

  • In-migration of co-ethnics can lead to emphasizing national identity
  • Antagonism toward refugees
    • leads to overcoming ethnic divisions within a country
    • solving collective action problems
  • This is a psychological story… where are the institutions?
    • Tanzanian government hostile toward refugees in multi-party era (strategic)
    • History of nation-building policies in Tanzania (structural)