November 7, 2018
How are …
… described or portrayed
How are the
described or narrated
rationalization: portrayal of actor as being rational, sensible, or logical
repudation: portrayal of actor as being irrational, illogical, or erratic
inclusion: language and symbols that connects actor with wider community and encourages audience identification with the actor (e.g. humanizing actor, having desirable attributes)
expurgation: symbols/language that make actors into scapegoat or otherwise evil, strange, or not part of the community shared by the audience (e.g. dehumanizing language, emphasis on undesirable traits)
euphemism: description of actor with valorizing or positive adjective instead of neutral or negative terms (describing drunkenly destroying property as "had a little too much fun")
dysphemism: description of actor with negative or pejorative adjective instead of neutral or positive terms (calling someone a "butcher" rather than they "committed homicide"")
"Erected by his countrymen in honor of the military genius of Lieutenant General Nathan Bedford Forrest"
authorization: depiction of actor as being a figure of or having authority to act.
described as "tireless champion of strong borders and the rule of law"
after being convicted of racial profiling to round up suspected illegal immigrants
blameworthy: portrayals that imply victims of violence as somehow deserving what happened to them (e.g. emphasizing that person shot by police had criminal charges)
praiseworthy: portrayals that imply perpetrators of violence will be or ought to be praised for their actions
Repudiate, expurgate, dysphemism, blame
Rationalize, include, euphemism, authorize